What is breadth-first crawling vs. depth-first crawling?
TL;DR
Breadth-first crawling explores all pages at the current link depth before moving deeper, while depth-first crawling follows one path to its end before backtracking. Breadth-first finds high-quality pages faster since important content typically sits closer to the homepage, making it the preferred strategy for search engines. Depth-first works better for focused crawling of specific topics or when exploring narrow, deep site structures.
What Are These Crawling Strategies?
Breadth-first search and depth-first search are two fundamental algorithms that determine how web crawlers traverse websites. BFS treats website structure as layers radiating from a seed URL, visiting all pages one link away before visiting pages two links away. DFS follows a single path through linked pages until hitting a dead end, then backtracks to explore alternative routes.
The choice between these strategies dramatically affects which pages get crawled first and how quickly crawlers discover different types of content.
How Breadth-First Crawling Works
Breadth-first crawling uses a queue to manage the URL frontier. The crawler starts at seed URLs, downloads those pages, and extracts all links. Those discovered links get crawled before any second-level links are followed.
This creates a wave pattern spreading outward from starting points. Pages linked from the homepage get crawled first, then pages linked from those, and so on. Search engines prefer this approach because important pages typically sit closer to the homepage with many incoming links.
How Depth-First Crawling Works
Depth-first crawling uses a stack structure, following links recursively until reaching pages with no new outbound links. When hitting a dead end, it backtracks to the most recent page with unexplored links and continues down that path.
This creates a drilling pattern exploring one branch fully before moving to adjacent branches. The crawler might descend dozens of clicks deep before visiting pages just one click from the starting point. Depth-first uses less memory by tracking only the current path rather than storing all URLs at each level.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Breadth-First | Depth-First |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery pattern | Layer by layer outward | Deep into single paths |
| Memory usage | Higher (stores all current level URLs) | Lower (stores only current path) |
| Best for | Finding important pages quickly | Exploring specific topics deeply |
| Search engine preference | Preferred for general indexing | Used for focused crawling |
When to Choose Each Strategy
Use breadth-first crawling for general web indexing where you want to discover high-priority content quickly. This works best for large-scale crawls where important pages have strong link support near site entrances.
Choose depth-first when targeting specific content clustered in deep site sections, like academic papers in nested categories. Depth-first also makes sense for memory-constrained crawlers or narrow but deep architectures. Many production crawlers combine both, using breadth-first as default while switching to depth-first for specific domains.
Key Takeaways
Breadth-first crawling explores sites layer by layer, visiting all pages at one depth before moving deeper, while depth-first follows paths to their end before backtracking. Search engines prefer breadth-first because important pages cluster near site entrances. Breadth-first uses more memory storing all current-level URLs, while depth-first conserves memory tracking only the current path. The choice depends on objectives: breadth-first excels at general indexing, depth-first works better for focused exploration or memory-constrained environments.
data from the web