How to search arXiv and PubMed in ChatGPT

Pull real papers from arXiv and PubMed, read what a paper actually says and see how reviewers rated it, all in one conversation. With the Firecrawl plugin, ChatGPT can search arXiv and PubMed through Firecrawl Alexandria, and read public peer reviews from OpenReview.

• Researchers starting a literature review who need a list of papers that exist, with IDs.
• Clinicians and students looking for recent reviews in PubMed on a drug, condition or method.
• Machine learning readers checking how ICLR reviewers judged a paper before building on it.

Plugin: the Firecrawl plugin. It gives ChatGPT the PubMed, OpenReview and Research Index tools, and each paid lookup comes out of the credits on your linked Firecrawl account, so free index searches and paid lookups sit side by side.

Explore Firecrawl Alexandria data providers across categories

Replace the topic with the one you're researching:

@firecrawl I'm reading up on hallucination detection in large language
models. Using Firecrawl Alexandria, search arXiv through the Firecrawl
Research Index, PubMed, and OpenReview. Show me the price of each tool
before you run it.
 
Give me:
- Five arXiv papers in cs.CL from 2026, with arXiv ID, title and a
  one-line summary of the abstract.
- Three PubMed reviews from 2025 or 2026 that mention large language
  models and hallucination in the title or abstract, newest first, with
  PMID and journal.
- ICLR 2025 submissions with "hallucination detection" in the title,
  marked as poster, oral, rejected or withdrawn.
 
Only list papers the tools returned, with their IDs. Don't fill gaps
from memory.

• Add the plugin to ChatGPT. Use the button at the end of this list to open the Firecrawl listing.
• Connect a Firecrawl account. PubMed and OpenReview calls draw on its credits. You can sign up for free.
• No terms to accept. Our account wasn't asked to accept provider terms for any of the three in our Oct 9, 2026 API tests. If yours is, an organization admin can accept them in the Firecrawl dashboard.

A literature search only helps if every paper on the list is real, current and read in context. ChatGPT on its own struggles with all three.

1. References it makes up. OpenAI says ChatGPT can fabricate quotes and citations (OpenAI). A plausible title, real-sounding authors and a believable journal can add up to a paper nobody wrote.
2. This month's preprints. The same OpenAI page explains that, without a tool to look things up, ChatGPT's knowledge ends at its training cutoff. On a fast-moving topic like speculative decoding, the papers that matter most may be the ones posted after the model's cutoff.
3. Abstracts, not papers. PubMed holds more than 40 million citations and abstracts and doesn't include full-text articles, only links to them (PubMed). OpenAI adds that paywalls and robots.txt can keep ChatGPT from reading some sites, so the methods section you need may be out of reach.
4. Queries that change under you. PubMed runs searches through Automatic Term Mapping, which can expand your words into MeSH terms, and its Search Details show how a query was translated (PubMed). A loose question typed into a chatbot hides which query PubMed really ran.
5. Preprints aren't peer reviewed. arXiv states that its moderation process is not peer review (arXiv). Where reviews do exist, OpenReview lets each venue decide who can read them and when (OpenReview), and a general web search may not bring them up.
6. Retractions that go unnoticed. NLM tags retracted articles in PubMed as Retracted Publication and links them to the retraction notice (NLM). A reference recalled from training data carries no such flag.

Three sources answer a paper question in ChatGPT:

• Firecrawl Alexandria: the layer that connects AI agents to licensed and indexed data. It holds 100+ official providers that are compensated under contract whenever an agent pulls their data, plus Firecrawl's Web, Research, Developer and Government indexes. In an 845-task comparison that kept models and prompts fixed, agents given Firecrawl Alexandria produced answers rated 21% better than the same agents working with only the built-in browsing tools.
• The Firecrawl Research Index for arXiv: Firecrawl's own paper index, which its documentation says covers about 43 million abstracts, mostly biomedical, alongside arXiv for physics, mathematics and computer science. Search returns arXiv IDs you can check, and a passage read pulls text from inside the paper.
• PubMed with real query syntax: the PubMed tool takes field tags like [tiab] and [pt], and returns PubMed's own translation of the query along with the total hit count. Our test search for GLP-1 receptor agonist reviews from 2025 onward found 2,692 records.
• OpenReview for the review record: search a venue's submissions to see which were accepted, rejected or withdrawn, then search its public replies for the reviews themselves.

Write the prompt around the literature you work in. For a clinical or biomedical review:

@firecrawl Search PubMed for review articles on GLP-1 receptor agonists
published since January 2025, newest first. List PMID, title, journal and
publication date, then open the newest systematic review and give me its
abstract and conflict-of-interest statement.

For machine learning research:

@firecrawl Find 2026 arXiv papers on speculative decoding in cs.CL with
the Firecrawl Research Index. Then show me which speculative decoding
papers were accepted at ICLR 2025 as orals or posters on OpenReview.

Name the field, the date window and the IDs you want back, and ChatGPT routes biomedical questions to PubMed and preprints to the Research Index.

Read the reviews

@firecrawl Search public ICLR 2025 reviews on OpenReview for "speculative
cascades". For "Faster Cascades via Speculative Decoding", list each
reviewer's rating, confidence and main weakness.

Quote a result from the paper

@firecrawl Find the arXiv paper "Beyond Tokens: Semantic-Aware Speculative
Decoding" in the Firecrawl Research Index and pull the passages that
report its speedup.

Screen out retractions

@firecrawl Search PubMed for ivermectin and COVID-19 papers with the
publication type Retracted Publication, and list PMID, title and journal.

Narrow by author

@firecrawl Use the Firecrawl Research Index to find 2026 arXiv papers on
hallucination detection, filtered to an author I name, with arXiv IDs.

Price check first

@firecrawl Which tools can search PubMed, arXiv or OpenReview? Show the
price of each before running any.

Browsing the catalog is free, and so is seeing what a tool charges. Paid tools take credits from your Firecrawl account only when ChatGPT runs them, and you can compare monthly credit allowances by plan on Firecrawl pricing.

Each answer names the tool ChatGPT called and what that call cost in credits.

• How to find papers that cite a study in ChatGPT: follow a paper forward to the work that built on it.
• PubMed open-access full text: PubMed's full-text tool reads the body of open-access PMC articles once you have a PMCID, for 5 credits.
• OpenReview venues: list the venues OpenReview hosts, such as every ICLR year, and read one venue's dates and submission policy.

• Reviews only where venues publish them. OpenReview's tool searches public replies by topic and can't pull one paper's thread by ID, so match reviews by title. ICLR publishes reviews; many venues don't.
• New PubMed records start thin. A 2026 review we opened had no MeSH headings yet, since indexing comes later, and full text is limited to open-access PMC articles.
• Index dates are update dates. The Research Index date filter matches when a paper was created or last updated, so a revised older preprint can appear in a recent window. A passage read can also come back empty without meaning the paper has nothing on the topic.